Days right after Indian photojournalist Danish Siddiqui was killed in Afghanistan by the Taliban, a US-based Indian origin Professor has claimed that the Islamist terror outfit exhibited extra humanity than the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS).
In a tweet on Saturday (July 17), Gaurav Sabnis wrote, “Even the Taliban by itself is displaying far more humanity over #DanishSiddiqui than the Sangh.” Sabnis, an Associate Marketing Professor at the Stevens Institute of Technologies, posted the tweet in reaction to the criticism confronted by Siddiqui following his dying. The deceased photojournalist had previously clicked pictures of burning funeral pyres in obvious breach of privateness of the spouse and children of the Covid-19 victims and also set it up for sale on British-owned stock pictures agency Alamy.
Through his tweet, Gaurav Sabnis advised that the Taliban experienced showcased additional humanity than Sangh (and its followers) irrespective of the former being the killer of the photojournalist. The strange analogy, aimed at dehumanising RSS and eliminating the role of Taliban in the context of Danish Siddiqui’s loss of life, was not perfectly-received by netizens. A Twitter person (Princess Woke Liberal) took potshots at the Marketing Professor and wrote, “Taliban did not kill Danis Siddiqui, RSS did.” Pursuing his remark, Gaurav Sabnis was fast to block the consumer on the micro-blogging web site.
Later on, Sabnis attempted to justify his previously tweet wherein he claimed that Sangh was less humane than the Taliban. He alleged, “The only purpose sanghi vultures are striving to peck at #DanishSiddiqui is for the reason that he took a image proving the whole scale of covid fatalities and ensuing cremations in India. Basically the only motive. For the reason that some of his pictures spoiled their deluded narratives.”

The Assistant Marketing Professor even more claimed, “Notice how the only types on Twitter dumping on heroic late image journalist #DanishSiddique are sanghis. Because they are even now upset that when BJP tried using to disguise the whole scope of covid next surge deaths in India, Danish took this photograph. Which is the only motive. Sick!” In purchase to further deviate general public wrath from his initial tweet about Sangh and Taliban, he wrote, “How a lot of million lives are you keen to sacrifice for the sake of retaining the delusional that Modi is amazing?”
Liberals refuse to phone out Taliban above Danish Siddiqui’s killing
Various still left-wing “liberal-secular” journalists also took to Twitter to condole the loss of life of photojournalist Danish Siddiqui, who aggressively shared these visuals of the deceased photojournalist to pay out some type of tribute to him. However, the intriguing element of the subject is that hardly any of them pointed out the Taliban in their condolence message.
Rana Ayyub spoke about Danish Siddiqui and his work revealing how he had a enthusiasm for photography. She also shared an graphic in which she was witnessed sitting future to the deceased journalist. The tone and tenor of the information, however, have been instead perplexing. It appeared as if the photojournalist died as a consequence of some organic disorder and was not murdered by Islamic terrorists. A equivalent tactic was employed by Manisha Pande from Newslaundry, Stuti Mishra, Arfa Khanum Sherwani, Yogendra Yadav, and Ravish Kumar.
It is perplexing that not a solitary condolence information pointed in the direction of the Islamic terror group that claimed Siddiqui’s lifetime. Not a single liberal journalist had the ethical fortitude to remark that he was killed by the Taliban in Afghanistan. Liberals made use of his pictures to make a political point but refused to point out that it was the Taliban that killed him all through clashes with Afghan forces. Alternatively, they attempted to whitewash the incident and deflect the narrative by preaching about how a single ought to consider inspiration from Danish Siddiqui to query individuals in power.